I recently saw a post by Salie Davis/Sarah B Royal of asemic (meaning-free) poetry, and it made me wonder if this squiggle I did last year would count as a poem.
What do you think?

My current poeting mentor, Kit Kelen, does a lot of artwork along these lines…maybe that’s asemic poetry too?
Care to make your own?
Discover more from Wordflower
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Kit Kelen has since told me that asemic writing is not a thing…that there can be no writing without symbols and no symbols without meaning
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even in my squiggles there are waves and tallies/counting, for example
LikeLike
Interesting. ‘not a thing’, yet there is someone claiming it is, even describing it. Does that make it ‘a thing’?
It reminds me of some poem I saw that was purely typed symbols or even parts of Kerouac’s writing that devolves into symbols rather than words.
At that website, it says an asemic poem could be in sound. Wouldn’t all poems in a language that we don’t understand still be called poetry?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah there can be sounds without meaning, probably
LikeLike
Kit actually said:
Personally, I think asemicism is a nonsense idea … however there is some very beautiful nonsense being made in the service of this illusion
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is a word, other than letters in specific order, or hieroglyph, or hierarchic drawing
with meaning for those who are open to understand the incomprehensible, including
those with mental drill or plated grey matter… `j>y;[g}
LikeLiked by 1 person
there are squiggles that look like letters but are not letters? maybe
LikeLike